ninan.org

Baby names in North Dakota

What parents in North Dakota actually named their children in 2025, and which names the state uses far more than the country does.

Top 20 girls' names in North Dakota, 2025

#NameBirths
1 Charlotte 42
2 Lainey 39
3 Olivia 34
4 Ellie 33
5 Evelyn 32
6 Amelia 30
7 Ella 29
8 Hazel 29
9 Ivy 29
10 Emma 28
11 Aurora 26
12 Harper 26
13 Isla 26
14 Lucy 26
15 Nora 26
16 Violet 26
17 Elizabeth 24
18 Eleanor 23
19 Elsie 23
20 Willow 23

Top 20 boys' names in North Dakota, 2025

#NameBirths
1 Liam 56
2 Henry 49
3 Theodore 49
4 Noah 48
5 Oliver 47
6 Cooper 40
7 Hudson 37
8 Bennett 34
9 James 33
10 Colter 32
11 Asher 31
12 Jack 31
13 Leo 31
14 Elias 30
15 Elijah 30
16 Stetson 30
17 Brooks 29
18 Wesley 29
19 William 29
20 Owen 28

The most distinctive names in North Dakota

These are the names North Dakota uses most out of proportion to the rest of the country. The location quotient is the state's share of births going to a name divided by the national share, over 2016–2025. A quotient of 3.0 means the name is three times as common here as it is nationally.

NameBirths in North DakotaLocation quotient
Boy 66 122.5×
Bridger 115 20.3×
Briggs 141 10.4×
Boden 50 10.1×
Hattie 111 8.1×
Greta 54 7.5×
Colter 92 6.9×
Otto 112 6.5×
Briar 105 6.5×
Dax 70 6.2×
Soren 64 6.0×
Elsie 155 5.6×
Stetson 119 5.4×
Hayes 154 5.3×
Thea 105 5.3×
Rhett 223 5.3×
Kora 58 5.2×
Porter 68 5.1×
Odin 85 5.1×
Ryker 232 4.8×

The number one name in North Dakota, year by year

Twenty years of first-place names.
YearGirlsBirthsBoysBirths
2025 Charlotte 42 Liam 56
2024 Evelyn 49 Oliver 56
2023 Evelyn 46 Oliver 69
2022 Olivia 47 Oliver 52
2021 Olivia 52 Oliver 57
2020 Hazel 44 Oliver 51
2019 Amelia 55 Liam 63
2018 Olivia 63 Oliver 57
2017 Emma 70 Oliver 74
2016 Olivia 66 Oliver 74
2015 Emma 71 Liam 63
2014 Harper 69 Liam 68
2013 Emma 92 Mason 66
2012 Emma 64 Mason 61
2011 Emma 67 Mason 71
2010 Sophia 53 Mason 64
2009 Olivia 63 Logan 60
2008 Ava 65 Carter 62
2007 Emma 64 Logan 67
2006 Ava 63 Logan 73

State files start in 1910 and use the same five-birth reporting floor as the national data, applied per state, year and sex — so small states show fewer distinct names, not fewer names in use.