ninan.org

Baby names in Iowa

What parents in Iowa actually named their children in 2025, and which names the state uses far more than the country does.

Top 20 girls' names in Iowa, 2025

#NameBirths
1 Charlotte 158
2 Evelyn 117
3 Emma 116
4 Amelia 112
5 Eleanor 109
6 Olivia 107
7 Sophia 104
8 Lainey 101
9 Harper 98
10 Violet 97
11 Hazel 90
12 Nora 88
13 Ava 86
14 Lucy 84
15 Aurora 83
16 Ellie 76
17 Ivy 74
18 Elizabeth 72
19 Isabella 72
20 Millie 72

Top 20 boys' names in Iowa, 2025

#NameBirths
1 Oliver 198
2 Liam 185
3 Henry 176
4 Theodore 176
5 Cooper 133
6 Hudson 124
7 James 118
8 Noah 118
9 Bennett 113
10 Owen 106
11 Elijah 101
12 Jack 100
13 Beau 98
14 William 96
15 Waylon 90
16 Leo 88
17 Miles 85
18 Mateo 83
19 Weston 82
20 Asher 81

The most distinctive names in Iowa

These are the names Iowa uses most out of proportion to the rest of the country. The location quotient is the state's share of births going to a name divided by the national share, over 2016–2025. A quotient of 3.0 means the name is three times as common here as it is nationally.

NameBirths in IowaLocation quotient
Kinnick 93 71.1×
Carver 106 10.1×
Brecken 155 7.1×
Kollyns 61 6.2×
Huxley 192 5.7×
Cal 108 5.0×
Kinzley 67 5.0×
Briggs 266 4.9×
Berkley 122 4.8×
Tate 429 4.6×
Kolter 50 4.6×
Crue 71 4.3×
Kolt 55 4.3×
Clay 141 4.3×
Maren 177 4.1×
Vayda 60 4.1×
Veda 102 4.1×
Drake 158 4.1×
Krew 104 4.0×
Lettie 55 4.0×

The number one name in Iowa, year by year

Twenty years of first-place names.
YearGirlsBirthsBoysBirths
2025 Charlotte 158 Oliver 198
2024 Charlotte 141 Oliver 192
2023 Charlotte 163 Oliver 195
2022 Olivia 175 Oliver 196
2021 Charlotte 173 Oliver 203
2020 Olivia 169 Oliver 213
2019 Charlotte 180 Oliver 234
2018 Harper 161 Oliver 186
2017 Harper 173 Oliver 211
2016 Olivia 207 Oliver 201
2015 Emma 200 Liam 215
2014 Emma 198 Liam 222
2013 Emma 204 Liam 220
2012 Emma 246 Liam 200
2011 Emma 204 Carter 196
2010 Ava 209 Noah 184
2009 Ava 215 Jacob 208
2008 Emma 250 Ethan 237
2007 Ava 282 Ethan 261
2006 Emma 318 Ethan 253

State files start in 1910 and use the same five-birth reporting floor as the national data, applied per state, year and sex — so small states show fewer distinct names, not fewer names in use.