ninan.org

Azul

Girls' name · Millennial-era

Living in the US
~4,900 survival-weighted estimate
2025 rank
#1,318 among girls
Births in 2025
207 4,885 since 1880
Typical age
13 years, median

Azul popularity over time

Azul rank by birth year, 1995–2025Azul ranked #7,041 in 1995 and #1,318 in 2025. Its best rank in the period was #615, in 2008.#1,000#1,318best #615 in 20081995200020052010201520202025
Rank among US baby names by birth year, 1995–2025. Lower is more popular; the scale is logarithmic so the top of the chart is not compressed.

Azul was used most in 2008, when 506 babies were given the name. 1995 is the earliest year with at least five recorded births. In 2025 it ranked #1,318 with 207 births.

Compared with 2015, births are up 22%. It slipped 39 places against the previous year.

Babies named Azul per yearPeaks at 506 births in 2008.506 in 200801995200020052010201520202025
Recorded US births by year. The peak is labelled; the axis starts at zero.

How many people are named Azul?

Roughly 4,900 Azuls are alive in the US right now. The split is about 4,500 women and 340 men.

This is a survival-weighted estimate, not a headcount: every recorded birth year is multiplied by the chance someone born that year is still alive, using the SSA period life table. How the estimate works.

How old is the average Azul?

Median age among living Azuls: 13. Most living bearers were born in the 2010s. By the site’s era rules that makes Azul a millennial-era name.

Your Azul

Ages of living people named AzulHalf of living Azuls are older than 13 and half younger.median 13020
Estimated living bearers by age today. Each bar is a birth year, weighted by the chance someone born then is still alive.

Where Azul is most common

Relative to births, Arizona carries 4.1× the national share of Azuls. California and Texas follow.

Where Azul is used more than average3 states use the name Azul more than the national average.Alaska: not over-representedAKMaine: not over-representedMEVermont: not over-representedVTNew Hampshire: not over-representedNHWashington: not over-representedWAIdaho: not over-representedIDMontana: not over-representedMTNorth Dakota: not over-representedNDMinnesota: not over-representedMNIllinois: not over-representedILWisconsin: not over-representedWIMichigan: not over-representedMINew York: not over-representedNYOregon: not over-representedORNevada: not over-representedNVWyoming: not over-representedWYSouth Dakota: not over-representedSDIowa: not over-representedIAIndiana: not over-representedINOhio: not over-representedOHPennsylvania: not over-representedPANew Jersey: not over-representedNJConnecticut: not over-representedCTRhode Island: not over-representedRICalifornia: 2.4× the national rateCAUtah: not over-representedUTColorado: not over-representedCONebraska: not over-representedNEMissouri: not over-representedMOKentucky: not over-representedKYWest Virginia: not over-representedWVVirginia: not over-representedVAMaryland: not over-representedMDDelaware: not over-representedDEMassachusetts: not over-representedMAArizona: 4.1× the national rateAZNew Mexico: not over-representedNMKansas: not over-representedKSArkansas: not over-representedARTennessee: not over-representedTNNorth Carolina: not over-representedNCSouth Carolina: not over-representedSCDistrict of Columbia: not over-representedDCOklahoma: not over-representedOKLouisiana: not over-representedLAMississippi: not over-representedMSAlabama: not over-representedALGeorgia: not over-representedGAHawaii: not over-representedHITexas: 2.1× the national rateTXFlorida: not over-representedFL
Same as national3× or more
Location quotient, 2016–2025. Shaded states use the name more than the country does, relative to their own births. Exact figures are in the table below.
States where Azul is over-represented, 2016–2025. The location quotient compares the state's share of the name with the national share.
StateBirthsvs national rate
Arizona 127 4.1×
California 445 2.4×
Texas 351 2.1×

Is Azul a boy's or a girl's name?

93% girls7% boys
Share of all recorded US births under this name, 1880 to the latest year.

Mostly given to girls: 16.6% of the last ten years of births were boys. Across the whole record, 93.1% of births under the name were girls.

Related pages

Get this data