ninan.org

Analise

Girls' name · Millennial-era

Living in the US
~4,500 survival-weighted estimate
2025 rank
#2,276 among girls
Births in 2025
80 4,592 since 1880
Typical age
16 years, median

Analise popularity over time

Analise rank by birth year, 1972–2025Analise ranked #8,292 in 1972 and #2,276 in 2025. Its best rank in the period was #1,132, in 2009.#10,000#2,276best #1,132 in 200919801990200020102020
Rank among US baby names by birth year, 1972–2025. Lower is more popular; the scale is logarithmic so the top of the chart is not compressed.

2009 is the peak year for Analise, with 223 births. 1972 is the earliest year with at least five recorded births. As of 2025 the name sits at #2,276, with 80 births that year.

Over ten years the count has fallen 49%. Year on year the rank dropped by 158.

Babies named Analise per yearPeaks at 223 births in 2009.223 in 2009019801990200020102020
Recorded US births by year. The peak is labelled; the axis starts at zero.

How many people are named Analise?

About 4,500 people named Analise are alive in the United States today. SSA has recorded 4,592 births under the name since 1880.

This is a survival-weighted estimate, not a headcount: every recorded birth year is multiplied by the chance someone born that year is still alive, using the SSA period life table. How the estimate works.

How old is the average Analise?

Half of living Analises are older than 16, half younger. The 2000s produced the largest surviving cohort. By the site’s era rules that makes Analise a millennial-era name.

Your Analise

Ages of living people named AnaliseHalf of living Analises are older than 16 and half younger.median 1602040
Estimated living bearers by age today. Each bar is a birth year, weighted by the chance someone born then is still alive.

Where Analise is most common

The name is concentrated in Florida, at 1.5× the national rate.

Where Analise is used more than average2 states use the name Analise more than the national average.Alaska: not over-representedAKMaine: not over-representedMEVermont: not over-representedVTNew Hampshire: not over-representedNHWashington: not over-representedWAIdaho: not over-representedIDMontana: not over-representedMTNorth Dakota: not over-representedNDMinnesota: not over-representedMNIllinois: not over-representedILWisconsin: not over-representedWIMichigan: not over-representedMINew York: not over-representedNYOregon: not over-representedORNevada: not over-representedNVWyoming: not over-representedWYSouth Dakota: not over-representedSDIowa: not over-representedIAIndiana: not over-representedINOhio: not over-representedOHPennsylvania: not over-representedPANew Jersey: not over-representedNJConnecticut: not over-representedCTRhode Island: not over-representedRICalifornia: not over-representedCAUtah: not over-representedUTColorado: not over-representedCONebraska: not over-representedNEMissouri: not over-representedMOKentucky: not over-representedKYWest Virginia: not over-representedWVVirginia: not over-representedVAMaryland: not over-representedMDDelaware: not over-representedDEMassachusetts: not over-representedMAArizona: not over-representedAZNew Mexico: not over-representedNMKansas: not over-representedKSArkansas: not over-representedARTennessee: not over-representedTNNorth Carolina: not over-representedNCSouth Carolina: not over-representedSCDistrict of Columbia: not over-representedDCOklahoma: not over-representedOKLouisiana: not over-representedLAMississippi: not over-representedMSAlabama: not over-representedALGeorgia: not over-representedGAHawaii: not over-representedHITexas: 1.4× the national rateTXFlorida: 1.5× the national rateFL
Same as national3× or more
Location quotient, 2016–2025. Shaded states use the name more than the country does, relative to their own births. Exact figures are in the table below.
States where Analise is over-represented, 2016–2025. The location quotient compares the state's share of the name with the national share.
StateBirthsvs national rate
Florida 83 1.5×
Texas 148 1.4×

Related pages

Get this data